I doubt that it is a good practice to ship the public key used to sign things in the repository in the repository itself
– Junio C Hamano, git@vger.kernel.org: expired key in junio-gpg-pub
Git ships with the maintainer’s public key.
But you won’t find it in your worktree—it’s hidden in plain sight.
Junio Hamano’s public key is a blob in the git
object
database. It’s tagged with junio-gpg-pub
, so you can only
see it with git cat-file
:
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git cat-file blob junio-gpg-pub
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1
...
In 2021, Junio pretty much said that this was a bad idea.
But it led me to think about some other wonderful bad ideas.
Fake empty GitHub repos 📦
I made an empty GitHub repo called hidden-zangief.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21bfd/21bfd54feb556389a1e7f785d82b65dd903ddc50" alt="hidden-zangief"
Except it’s not empty.
Instead, it’s chockfull of sweet ANSI art—Zangief from Street Fighter II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/157f0/157f0a94df7e017e134eb1209f280485a6be18c6" alt="Zangief + Figlet = magic"
And if you clone it, after an initial warning, you can see Zangief is still in there:
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git clone https://github.com/thcipriani/hidden-zangief && cd hidden-zangief
Cloning into 'hidden-zangief'...
warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git fetch origin refs/atomic/piledriver
remote: Enumerating objects: 1, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (1/1), done.
remote: Total 1 (delta 0), reused 1 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Unpacking objects: 100% (1/1), 1.71 KiB | 1.71 MiB/s, done.
From https://github.com/thcipriani/hidden-zangief
* branch refs/atomic/piledriver -> FETCH_HEAD
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git show FETCH_HEAD
[...sweet zangief ansi art...]
_____ _ __
|__ /__ _ _ __ __ _(_) ___ / _|
/ // _` | '_ \ / _` | |/ _ \ |_
/ /| (_| | | | | (_| | | __/ _|
/____\__,_|_| |_|\__, |_|\___|_|
|___/
Dubious git plumbing hacks 🪓
Inspired by Junio, I misused and finagled a couple of git plumbing commands to make this fake empty repo:
git hash-object
git update-ref
First, I used hash-object
to create a dangling git
object with the ~/zangief.txt
contents.
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ mkdir /tmp/hidden-zangief && cd /tmp/hidden-zangief
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git init
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git hash-object -w ~/zangief.txt
7dd9e2d2d2d8b5107d225b4708e1177abb08e7c8
Now Zangief is lurking in your git plumbing, atomic-suplexing your other git objects.
I imagine this is how Junio added his public key to the git object
database. Then he tagged it with junio-gpg-pub
and pushed
it to the git
repo.
But a tag would appear in the GitHub UI, and I wondered whether I could hide it.
So I opted to abuse the wide-open git ref namespace, imagining a ref
beyond tags and branches: refs/atomic/piledriver
.
Then I schlepped that ref to GitHub.
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git update-ref refs/atomic/piledriver 7dd9e2d2d2d8b5107d225b4708e1177abb08e7c8
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git remote add origin https://github.com/thcipriani/hidden-zangief
(/^ヮ^)/*:・゚✧ git push origin refs/atomic/piledriver:refs/atomic/piledriver
And, of course, Microsoft GitHub foolishly neglects the
refs/atomic/*
namespace in their UI, rendering our 400 lb
wrestler friend invisible.
Infinite magic awaits the intrepid developer willing to abuse
git
plumbing. After all, git is just a database with a
terrible interface.